Other news:
- October 11th is the last day to register to vote for the upcoming Nov 8th election
- Office hours remain Thursdays between 9-1
- November 8th meeting date changed due to the election- J. Fairbanks-motion to move meeting date to November 16th
Monday, September 26, 2011
More UpComing News
About 30 neighbors came out for the September meeting, and a lot of ground was covered. October's meeting may very well be even better attended as the ORV policy for Elk Township will be on the agenda again. Come on out and air your views.
Other news:
Other news:
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
More Community Goodwill...
Elk vs. Sauble Ball Game
The Trophy given by Bill Gillard to Douglas Mann
Sunday, August 21, 2011
August 17, 2011
Elk Township has a full board and finally was able to conduct business as usual. Well, almost usual...
The public seemed very receptive of the new board's style of balancing citizen's input with board business.
Another noteworthy piece of information dealt with the engineering analysis of the existing township hall. Nordlund & Associates gave the almost 100-yr old building a clean bill of health and actually suggested removing the siding and showing the concrete blocks which were reportedly made "on site." All foundations, flooring, and existing roof were found to be sound. The report was well received, but no plans are in the works to do anything with the existing building.
A BIG THANK YOU TO ROGER BUCKINGHAM FOR SAVING A HUMMINGBIRD WHO HAD COME IN TO SEE ALL THE GOODWILL FLYING ABOUT THE TOWN HALL. ROGER CAUGHT HIM IN HIS HANDS WHEN THE LITTLE CREATURE WAS UNABLE TO FIND HIS WAY OUT OF THE HALL.
Another noteworthy piece of information dealt with the engineering analysis of the existing township hall. Nordlund & Associates gave the almost 100-yr old building a clean bill of health and actually suggested removing the siding and showing the concrete blocks which were reportedly made "on site." All foundations, flooring, and existing roof were found to be sound. The report was well received, but no plans are in the works to do anything with the existing building.
Tuesday, August 16, 2011
Meeting of New Board
The New Township Board will consist of three newly appointed members and two former members. As you know, the recall of Super, Clerk, and Trustee was successful, so the three posts had to be appointed, and those three members will serve until the next regular election date, November 8, 2011. Then we do all the campaign signs again in Nov of 2012 when the entire board runs anew. So, the new super called a special meeting for Wednesday eve at 7pm to get acquainted with the electors and do the business of the township. Come on out...
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
WANTED...SUPERVISOR, CLERK, TRUSTEE
The Elk Township Board, or what is left of them, will be accepting resumes for the positions of Supervisor, Clerk, and Trustee until Thursday @ 1pm. Regular office hours for the township are Thursdays 9-1, so drop off a resume today.
The "Board" has called a special meeting to fill those positions for Saturday, August 13 @ 9am. This is an open meeting, so come on out and let your township board know YOU KNOW!
The "Board" has called a special meeting to fill those positions for Saturday, August 13 @ 9am. This is an open meeting, so come on out and let your township board know YOU KNOW!
Sunday, August 7, 2011
The Next Step...
Now that the recall is finally over, signs have been taken down, and tempers are cooling, we wonder what is the next step?
It is my understanding that a committee of the election commission, consisting of the Judge, Clerk, and Treasurer of the county, will meet to appoint one member of the Elk Township Board, then with this quorum, the board can meet on Tues, our regularly scheduled board meeting, to appoint the rest of the board. This new board will serve until the next scheduled election, November 2011, or 2012 depending on the interpretation of election laws.
Anyway, that is only my interpretation, so come on out Tuesday to see for yourself. Hope to see you there!
It is my understanding that a committee of the election commission, consisting of the Judge, Clerk, and Treasurer of the county, will meet to appoint one member of the Elk Township Board, then with this quorum, the board can meet on Tues, our regularly scheduled board meeting, to appoint the rest of the board. This new board will serve until the next scheduled election, November 2011, or 2012 depending on the interpretation of election laws.
Anyway, that is only my interpretation, so come on out Tuesday to see for yourself. Hope to see you there!
Tuesday, August 2, 2011
PIGS CAN FLY!
UNOFFICIAL ELECTION RESULTS:
In a stunning turnout, voters have overwhelmingly spoken for recall...
Supervisor-Linda VanDolsen recalled 256 votes to 78
Clerk-Marilyn VanVleet recalled 244 to 85
Trustee-Frances "Cookie" Arquette recalled 245 to 84
What do you think?
In a stunning turnout, voters have overwhelmingly spoken for recall...
Supervisor-Linda VanDolsen recalled 256 votes to 78
Clerk-Marilyn VanVleet recalled 244 to 85
Trustee-Frances "Cookie" Arquette recalled 245 to 84
What do you think?
Thursday, July 28, 2011
Recall August 2, 2011
Many of you may have received a letter dated, well not dated, but signed by Linda Van Dolsen, Marilyn VanVleet, and Cookie Arquette. My entire voting family received their own individual copies in the mail today. I just couldn't pass up some very flagrant & inflammatory statements in said letter. For instance:
"Several years ago the previous township board formed a committee that studied the issue of a new township hall. That committee and the previous board pushed a dangerous, financially irresponsible $300,000.00 proposal. In 2006, the public forced the board to place a measure on the ballot to see if there was support for this project. The $300,000.00 proposal would have required the township to borrow at least half the money and may have required the township to increase property taxes to pay off that debt. That's right, they wanted to increase our taxes."
Wow, this paragraph is fraught with fallacies; where to begin?
Well, there was no "pushing", in fact the public in numerous meetings requested certain things be added to our current structure, such as, but not limited to, a basement, and a larger auditorium for hosting banquets and family gatherings.
Neither did the public force the board to place the measure on the ballot, that was a completely voluntary decision by a seated board, and the result of the vote was respected by that same board, hence the building project was dropped.
Now a new board, with some current members who were VERY VOCAL in their campaign against a larger township hall, has decided that they alone hold the powers to spend the very monies that the township requested not to be spent on a larger facility, and to do so with NO BIDS, and LITTLE INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC WHICH PUT THEM IN OFFICE. This is not beneficial leadership.
Another fallacy, which I believe this board understands to be misleading, is that a seated board can raise your property taxes. This is just not true. Remember, we are not the federal government, and a township government has NO AUTHORITY TO RAISE TAXES. Any raise in taxes past the Headley Amendment Rollback, must be voted on by the taxpayers. This is plain 'ole fear mongering.
Finally, this letter references people who want a seat on the board, but who is to say this is true. Who has said anyone wants a seat on this board? Who would voluntarily beat themselves up with their own severed arm.
Enjoy your week, and remember to vote your conscience on August 2nd.
"Several years ago the previous township board formed a committee that studied the issue of a new township hall. That committee and the previous board pushed a dangerous, financially irresponsible $300,000.00 proposal. In 2006, the public forced the board to place a measure on the ballot to see if there was support for this project. The $300,000.00 proposal would have required the township to borrow at least half the money and may have required the township to increase property taxes to pay off that debt. That's right, they wanted to increase our taxes."
Wow, this paragraph is fraught with fallacies; where to begin?
Well, there was no "pushing", in fact the public in numerous meetings requested certain things be added to our current structure, such as, but not limited to, a basement, and a larger auditorium for hosting banquets and family gatherings.
Neither did the public force the board to place the measure on the ballot, that was a completely voluntary decision by a seated board, and the result of the vote was respected by that same board, hence the building project was dropped.
Now a new board, with some current members who were VERY VOCAL in their campaign against a larger township hall, has decided that they alone hold the powers to spend the very monies that the township requested not to be spent on a larger facility, and to do so with NO BIDS, and LITTLE INPUT FROM THE PUBLIC WHICH PUT THEM IN OFFICE. This is not beneficial leadership.
Another fallacy, which I believe this board understands to be misleading, is that a seated board can raise your property taxes. This is just not true. Remember, we are not the federal government, and a township government has NO AUTHORITY TO RAISE TAXES. Any raise in taxes past the Headley Amendment Rollback, must be voted on by the taxpayers. This is plain 'ole fear mongering.
Finally, this letter references people who want a seat on the board, but who is to say this is true. Who has said anyone wants a seat on this board? Who would voluntarily beat themselves up with their own severed arm.
Enjoy your week, and remember to vote your conscience on August 2nd.
Thursday, July 21, 2011
Regularly Scheduled Meeting of Elk Township Goes Well, and Recall Goes On...
Notice the new links on the side bar:
Not much news info to share, just that according to the Fire Department Chair, the origin of the K & K Grocery fire was deemed "Undetermined" by the fire marshall,
and August 6th is the Annual Fireman's Ball, held again at Skinner Park.
There were motions made, seconded and passed to survey the rest of Lakeview Cemetery; renew our township's insurance policy; and turn the foreclosed township properties over to the county for selling (parcels which have not paid their property taxes).
also...
Sample Ballots have been printed for the Recall Election which will be held August 2, 2011 at the Elk Township Hall, the wording is as follows:
"Linda VanDolsen, Elk Township Supervisor (Marilyn VanVleet, Elk Township Clerk, and Frances Arquette, Elk Township Trustee), has demonstrated a lack of financial accountability and judgment when she committed Elk Township to spend $150,000.00 of cash reserve for a new town hall. She did not give due consideration to a less expensive proposal which would have extended the existing hall with new construction. The less expensive proposal would have added needed space and restored the integrity of the old building at considerable savings."
Links to interesting websites
- BSA Software Information on Taxes
- City-Data.com for Lake County
- Epodunk: Lake County Profile
- Lake County Free Public Records Directory
- Lake County Official Website
- Michigan Department of Natural Resources
- Michigan government
- Michigan Interactive Map
- Michigan Legislature
- Michigan Townships
- Snopes.com
- Wikipedia for Lake County, MI
Not much news info to share, just that according to the Fire Department Chair, the origin of the K & K Grocery fire was deemed "Undetermined" by the fire marshall,
and August 6th is the Annual Fireman's Ball, held again at Skinner Park.
There were motions made, seconded and passed to survey the rest of Lakeview Cemetery; renew our township's insurance policy; and turn the foreclosed township properties over to the county for selling (parcels which have not paid their property taxes).
also...
Sample Ballots have been printed for the Recall Election which will be held August 2, 2011 at the Elk Township Hall, the wording is as follows:
"Linda VanDolsen, Elk Township Supervisor (Marilyn VanVleet, Elk Township Clerk, and Frances Arquette, Elk Township Trustee), has demonstrated a lack of financial accountability and judgment when she committed Elk Township to spend $150,000.00 of cash reserve for a new town hall. She did not give due consideration to a less expensive proposal which would have extended the existing hall with new construction. The less expensive proposal would have added needed space and restored the integrity of the old building at considerable savings."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
